The Similarity Between Obama and Pearl Harbor
At first glance it’s logical to question the parallelism and connection between two seemingly disparate things. Bear with me though, to see if you might not agree.
World War I was halted in the late Fall of 1918. For the next six months a conference of nations took place in Paris, ending with the Treaty of Versailles, a document that re-drew borders of European countries, defined reparations paid by some nations to others and some opine, planted the seeds for World War II a mere two decades later. To the later there is, to this day, some conjecture. There is little argument, however, that the losses of WWI moved all nations to reticence regarding capricious or swift entrance into another such devastating conflict. Germany eventually was moved to a conquest and destruction mentality by the despotic Adolf Hitler, but that is a story for another writing.
As Roosevelt ran for his unprecedented third term as U.S. President in 1940, Britain was under seize of the Blitzkreig attacks by Germany. Notwithstanding this or the appeals for assistance by British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, an isolationist view was held by many if not most in the U.S. The feelings were so strong that to insure re-election, Roosevelt had to promise that as President he would not take the nation into a “foreign” war. The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, changed the isolationist view of citizens and Congress alike and the U.S. was no longer an observer of the conflict but a willing and aggressive participant.
The U.S. went blindly into the 2008 election season, wooed by the emotional oratory of a little known, experience deficient, community organizer who promised “change.” Now, some two years later, all but even the most die-hard liberals and socialists are terrified at what this “change” has wrought. And some liberals are looking at the situation in a similar manner as the Watts riots of a few decades ago when the rioters finally looked at the situation and saw, too late, that at their own hands they had destroyed their own homes and neighborhood.
If Obama had not been elected, we might have rocked along, enduring the indifference, stupidity, thievery, and self-serving actions of most lawmakers without there being a call to arms of the thinking electorate. It seems that there was a dearth of this educated and thinking segment of the population in the previous election. The early, post election, discussions about the leftist turn of the government turned to angry shouts and ultimately to ACTION. The Tea Party came into being and is permeating the fabric of the nation. The Tea Party is, in my view, a misnomer. It is really not a party at all, but a grass roots movement of citizens who are sick and tired of working hard only to see elected officials mismanage, take, give away and otherwise squander our national assets and way of life. A listing of the grievances against Obama is too long to print. Everything from taking over private companies, the appointment of 35 non vetted, non accountable czars, many of which have fascist and communistic leanings or alliances in their history, the non enforcement of laws and lie after lie, only touch the tip of this malevolent iceberg.
So, if the “sleeping giant” that is the U.S., awakens as it did in December of 1941, and moves back to a nation that rewards productivity and the traits on which this Nation was formed and does not reward the opposite, Obama’s effect will be the modern day epitome of Pearl Harbor. If so, then TORA, TORA, TORA!
